Flexnavet › WikiWiki ›Baltic Cable
Flexnavet
BläddraBrowse

Baltic Cable

Entity Updated 2026-10-04

A 600 MW HVDC cable linking Sweden's structurally deficit SE4 bidding area directly to Germany — privately owned (Baltic Cable AB), unlike the publicly TSO-operated interconnectors elsewhere in the region.

Under CCR Hansa, Baltic Cable AB bears 100% of redispatching and countertrading costs on its border — every other interconnector in the region splits these costs 50/50 between TSOs — an anomaly the methodology doesn't explain but likely traces to its private ownership.

Capacity — 600 MWCommissioned — 1994Redispatch/countertrading cost share (SE4-DE/LU) — 100% borne by Baltic Cable AB, vs 50/50 elsewhere

Baltic Cable is an HVDC (high-voltage direct current) submarine power cable connecting Sweden and Germany across the Baltic Sea. It is one of Sweden’s cross-border interconnectors that enable electricity trading between the Nordic and Continental European synchronous areas.

Key facts

  • Route: Trelleborg (Sweden, SE4) – Lübeck (Germany)
  • Capacity: 600 MW
  • Technology: HVDC, submarine cable
  • Commissioned: 1994
  • Operator: Baltic Cable AB

Relevance to the wiki

Baltic Cable is relevant to Flexibility and Congestion Management in several ways:

  • Cross-border flexibility — enables import/export between the Nordic and Continental markets, providing spatial flexibility across synchronous areas
  • SE4 pricing — as a connection from the southernmost Swedish bidding area (SE4, which has a structural deficit), it influences local electricity prices and the value of southern Swedish flexibility
  • Flow-Based Capacity Calculation — cross-border capacity on Baltic Cable (and other interconnectors) is now determined by the flow-based method adopted in the Nordics in October 2024
  • 70% rule — under Regulation Art. 16(8), Svenska kraftnät must make at least 70% of available cross-zonal capacity on interconnectors like Baltic Cable available for trade

CCR Hansa redispatching cost rule

Under the CCR Hansa RCCS Methodology (CACM Regulation Art. 74), Baltic Cable AB bears 100% of redispatching and countertrading costs for the SE4–DE/LU bidding-zone border. (Source - CCR Hansa RCCS Methodology and Ei Approval (2024))

This is unique within CCR Hansa: every other interconnector in the region uses 50%/50% cost sharing between TSOs (or thirds for the DK2–DE/LU Kontek cable). The 100% rule means that when redispatching or countertrading is needed to relieve congestion on the Sweden–Germany link, Baltic Cable AB bears the full cost — with no sharing between Svenska kraftnät or the German TSOs. The rationale is not stated in the methodology text but likely reflects Baltic Cable AB’s unique status as a privately owned interconnector, unlike the public TSO-operated cables elsewhere in the region.

The rule applies specifically to HVDC technical limits, fault/failure situations, and cases where operational security analysis identifies congestion on the Baltic Cable interconnector. For congestion arising in a TSO’s own control area — which is the most common case — the general CCR Hansa principle applies: the TSO in whose control area the physical congestion took place bears the cost.

Sources

Närliggande sidorNearby pages 10

KonceptConcept EntitetEntity ÖversiktOverview

Klicka på en nod för att gå dit. Dra för att panorera, rulla för att zooma. Click a node to go there. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom.