Source - Submetering for Flexibility Services Comillas (2024)
Academic journal article on submetering — dedicated measuring devices (DMDs) installed on individual circuits or appliances behind the customer connection point — as enabling infrastructure for flexibility services. Covers EU regulatory basis, international practice, a BeFlexible practitioner survey, and technical requirements for flexibility-grade measurement. Part of the BeFlexible Horizon project.
Bibliographic details
- Title: “Submetering: Challenges and opportunities for its application to the flexibility services”
- Authors: Chaves, J.P.; Davi-Arderius, D.; Troughton, J.; Cianotti, I.; Gallego, I.; Faure, M.
- Institutions: Comillas (IIT), Enel, Iberdrola
- Journal: Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports
- DOI: 10.1007/s40518-024-00235-8
- Year: 2024 (published online)
- Funding: BeFlexible project (EU Horizon, grant no. 101075438)
- Raw file:
raw/submetering-extracted.txt
Summary
Reviews the role of submetering as measurement infrastructure for flexibility services, establishing the EU regulatory hook (Art. 7b EMD Reform Regulation 2024/1747), surveying international practice, reporting BeFlexible practitioner survey results on current use and barriers, and specifying technical requirements for flexibility-grade DMDs. Introduces the conceptually useful distinction between settlement-grade and indicative-grade submetering, and notes Sweden as a country with existing submetering pilots for DSO congestion management.
Key claims
EU regulatory hook: Art. 7b EMD Reform
Art. 7b of Regulation 2024/1747 (Electricity Market Design Reform Regulation, in force July 2024) introduces a customer right to install dedicated measuring devices (DMDs) for individual circuits, loads, or appliances. Key points:
- DMDs are distinct from smart meters: smart meters measure total consumption at the connection point; DMDs measure specific loads behind the meter (EV charger, heat pump, battery, specific industrial circuit)
- Art. 7b creates the EU legal basis; implementation rules (technical standards, data format, access rights, cost recovery) remain pending at member-state level
- The right is for customers and aggregators to install DMDs, not a DSO obligation to provide them
Why submetering matters for flexibility
Without a DMD, a DER sharing a connection point with other loads is functionally invisible to the market. The whole-building meter sees only aggregate consumption. Submetering enables three things:
- Attribution — identifying which specific DER contributed what to a flexibility dispatch
- Baseline accuracy — actual pre/post consumption for the specific device, not a whole-building average prone to confounding load changes elsewhere in the building
- Small DER participation — making individually sub-threshold resources (a single EV charger, a small battery) observable, verifiable, and market-eligible; enabling aggregators to verify DER-level dispatch without modifying DSO metering infrastructure
This connects to the independent aggregator role (Aggregation): the aggregator can contract with and dispatch individual DERs in multi-DER premises without needing access to the DSO’s metering data.
BeFlexible practitioner survey findings
Current use of submetering for flexibility is limited — most DSO pilots rely on whole-building meters or proxy measurements.
| Barrier | Description |
|---|---|
| Cost | Hardware purchase, installation, and maintenance; no standard cost-recovery mechanism |
| Regulatory uncertainty | Data ownership unclear — who controls DMD data, the customer or DSO? |
| Data management complexity | More devices = more streams to reconcile; IT integration with aggregator platforms is non-standard |
Key opportunity identified by practitioners: submetering enables aggregators to verify DER-level dispatch without modifying the DSO’s AMI infrastructure — keeping the aggregator and DSO layers technically separate.
Most practitioners see submetering as a short-term enabler bridging the period until next-generation smart meters with sub-circuit reading capability are deployed at scale.
Technical requirements for flexibility-grade submetering
| Requirement | Threshold |
|---|---|
| Sampling rate | ≥1-minute intervals for real-time flexibility management; 15-minute sufficient for settlement |
| Communication latency | <5 minutes for activation verification in near-real-time applications |
| Data standards | CIM, DLMS/COSEM for interoperability with aggregator platforms and DSO systems |
| Security | Tamper detection (two-way) important for settlement-grade applications |
Settlement-grade vs indicative submetering — key conceptual distinction
Settlement-grade: tamper-proof, calibrated, legally defensible for billing and settlement; highest cost and compliance burden; regulated metering standards apply.
Indicative: sufficient for flexibility verification and baseline calculation; lower accuracy requirements; appropriate for most flexibility service applications.
Policy implication: most flexibility applications need indicative-grade only. Requiring settlement-grade for all submetering would impose disproportionate costs and slow adoption. Regulatory frameworks should distinguish the two tiers explicitly.
International practice and Swedish context
- Sweden: noted as having existing submetering pilots for DSO congestion management; pilots are DSO-initiated rather than customer/aggregator-initiated, raising data ownership questions; the next-generation AMI reform (Ei smart metering) is the context within which submetering must fit
- UK: Ofgem trials; some regulatory allowance for DMDs in certain BSC contexts
- Spain: limited regulatory allowance
- Cross-national pattern: practice is heavily concentrated on whole-building meters even where submetering would be technically beneficial
Relevance to wiki
Directly enriches:
- Baseline Methods — submetering as enabling infrastructure for attribution accuracy in mixed-DER portfolios; settlement-grade vs indicative distinction is directly applicable to method selection
- Aggregation — Art. 7b as the EU right that enables aggregators to measure DER-level dispatch independently; links to NC DR single-CU site registration concept
- Network Code on Demand Response — Art. 7b feeds into NC DR baseline and settlement framework; DMD right is part of the regulatory package NC DR T&C must reflect
- Electricity Market Design Reform 2024 — Art. 7b is part of Regulation 2024/1747; this source provides the full treatment of that article
- Distribution System Operator — data ownership: when DSOs control AMI and customers/aggregators install DMDs, access and governance questions arise
New concept page created: Submetering
Data gaps
- Swedish regulatory implementation status of Art. 7b DMD right — has Ei issued guidance or included DMDs in its smart metering reform work?
- Cost benchmarks for DMD hardware and installation in Swedish residential context
- Which Swedish DSO flexibility pilots use submetering, and for what specific flexibility application?